Found 87 posts - Go to Last Post
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
The two FF films did not do well because the stories were not good. The 2nd film was better then the first, but I barely remember the plots and that should say something. The films were entertaining at best. What would it take for you to say, that this is just a bad idea?So, if this universe has a black Johnny Storm, fine. Think about the previous two FF movies. They took decent enough actors, used bits and highlights directly from classic FF and Ultimate FF, made the characters look almost exactly as they did in those books, and produced shit. So, how about they go the complete opposite direction? Start with the basic idea, and create something unique from the ground up.Originally Posted by futiles
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
That is just it, does Fox honestly think that putting a black guy in a suit will make this movie better? Or are they pandering to black audiences, because they think they will not go see a movie unless there are represented in some way. The studio sees Samuel Jackson as Fury (who is barely tolerable in the role), see the success of the Avengers and then try to do their version. Except there are only four character to choose from. I have yet to see a positive reaction from the Johnny Storm casting and the rest of the cast for that matter.Now the movies are starting the same thing, keep the continuity of what we know, not too many franchise can pull of major character/actor changes... 007 being one that sticks out as standing the test if time, but the general public doesn't know the FF... So changing Johnny you have to change Sue I think its just going to look as a bad PC stunt..Originally Posted by B8TINGU
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
I would be fine with that except, X-men in particular have take elements from the comics and then executed them badly. Why not take the whole story because that is what make it good, its entirety and make that movie. The Walking Dead pulls it off because Kirkman is involved in the creative process writing and producing. I doubt they are tapping Chris Clarmont for his input when they should.Except that you kind of make my point. The movies are not the comics, and never can be, so, why be held to them. Most people tend to think that the Marvel Cinematic Universe has done the best job, so far, and they did exactly like I said. Movies are their own entity. Let them stand alone.Originally Posted by futiles
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
I don't think there is a single movie out there that can't make a profit. US plus world release will always recoup their money back. Then you take the film to the next revenue levels, Airplanes, Hotels, Disc Rental, Disc Sales, Netflix streaming services, Pay Cable, Free TV. There is a lot of money to be made in shit movies. I think success is better measured by time. If it was done well it will last and the money will follow regardless.Does it make money? Then it will be overkill:Originally Posted by futiles
Young adult fiction is popular because of Harry Potter? Jump on that train with any slightly similar idea.
Those books made good movies? Make all of them movies.
Splitting the final book into two movies worked? Hello 2-part finales.
What is that, a game where you play guitar? How about 2, and play drums and sing, and one every year, maybe two a year?
Just look back over the past 30 years. If it was popular, and made money, it was copied, processed, and driven into the ground.
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
The base story is from a Lucas treatment. Writers were hired, JJ Abrahms is directing and I am worried. There were issues with the script, They are not giving the film enough development time and plan to release it in Dec of 2015!I love industrialisms and excess!! I just can't wit to see the new Star Wars...and I wonder what there drawing that story from.. getting giddy, really hope they don't screw this up.Originally Posted by B8TINGU
I'd like to see more of the crimson guards..
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
Oh, I must have miss read it then. Out of all post singer movies I have to say First Class was probably the best.I said if they fix it in Days. I saw a rumor that said they might have them warn Prof. X in the past of what happens which would allow him to take more steps to prevent it thus retconing X3. Personally since the announcement that the next movie after Days will be Age of Apocalypse I have doubted the rumor since if they fixed the current day why not place it during that time period for the next movie instead of going to the far future.Originally Posted by Johndg
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
Well, the Walking Dead pulls it off because Kirkman said exactly what I have said above:I would be fine with that except, X-men in particular have take elements from the comics and then executed them badly. Why not take the whole story because that is what make it good, its entirety and make that movie. The Walking Dead pulls it off because Kirkman is involved in the creative process writing and producing. I doubt they are tapping Chris Clarmont for his input when they should.Originally Posted by MarvzMitts
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
Well Singer produced First Class so he had some input and he is directing Days and Apocalypse so I am hopeful for the future of the franchise. The Wolverine was much better than origins and is also supposedly getting a sequel so I am hoping they keep going up in quality.Oh, I must have miss read it then. Out of all post singer movies I have to say First Class was probably the best.Originally Posted by MarvzMitts
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
Ultimate Nick Fury maybe.. but original Nick Fury predates him by 30+ years.Oddly enough, Nick Fury is actually based on Samuel Jackson:Originally Posted by futiles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_Nick_Fury
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
Whatever dude...lol.. you never once said anything about General or Colonel, the fact remains that any version of NICK FURY is based off the original..so stop trying to back peddle..Colonel Fury is the one you are referring to. They refer to him as a general, which would be the one I linked to...Originally Posted by futiles
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
You can share this post with others using the following URL:
Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please post a new thread in this forum instead.
Sign up for a new account. It's free and easy!
Sign up for an accountAlready have an account? Login here
Login to your accountThread Title | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
---|---|---|---|
Started by JackCell
|
Gaming Chat | 4 | 06-07-2010 09:37 AM |
Keypress | Action |
---|---|
s | Move focus to site search box |
r | Move focus to quick reply box in a thread or message |
n | View the first unread post in a thread |
f | Toggle and scroll to filter options (on select pages) |
? | Toggle keyboard shortcut help dialog |